Unfactorized versus Factorized Calculations for P) Reactions at Gev Energies Typeset Using Revt E X 1
نویسنده
چکیده
In the literature, one often finds calculations of (e, ep) reactions at GeV energies using the factorization approach. Factorization implies that the differential cross section can be written as the product of an off-shell electron-proton cross section and a distorted missing momentum distribution. While this factorization appears in the non-relativistic plane wave impulse approximation, it is broken in a more realistic approach. The main source of factorization breaking are final state interactions. In this paper, sources of factorization breaking are identified and their numerical relevance is examined in the reaction 2H(e, ep) for various kinematic settings in the GeV regime. The results imply that factorization should not be used for precision calculations, especially as unfactorized calculations are available. 24.10.-i, 25.60.Gc, 25.30.Fj, 25.10+s Typeset using REVTEX
منابع مشابه
Unfactorized versus factorized calculations for 2 H ( e ,
In the literature, one often finds calculations of (e, ep) reactions at GeV energies using the factorization approach. Factorization implies that the differential cross section can be written as the product of an off-shell electron-proton cross section and a distorted missing momentum distribution. While this factorization appears in the non-relativistic plane wave impulse approximation, it is ...
متن کامل- th / 0 10 60 60 v 1 2 6 Ju n 20 01 1 A ( e , e ′ p ) reactions at GeV energies
An unfactorized and relativistic framework for calculating A(e, e ′ p) observables at typical JLAB energies is presented. Results of (e, e ′ p) model calculations for the target nuclei 12 C and 16 O are presented and compared to data from SLAC and JLAB.
متن کاملTypeset Using Revt E X 1
The cross sections for the processes γν → γγν, γγ → γνν̄ and νν̄ → γγγ are calculated for a range of center of mass energies from belowme to considerably above me, but much less than mW . This enables us to treat the neutrino– electron coupling as a four–Fermi interaction and results in amplitudes which are electron box diagrams with three real photons and one virtual photon at their vertices. Th...
متن کاملComment on " Comparison of Strangeness Production between A+a and P+p Reactions from 2 to 160 a Gev " , Typeset Using Revt E X
A recent paper on energy dependence of strangeness production in A+A and p+p interactions written by Dunlop and Ogilvie [1] indicates that there is a significant misunderstanding about the concept of strangeness enhancement and its role as a signal of Quark Gluon Plasma creation. In this comment we will try to clarify some essential points. PACS numbers: 25.75.Dw, 13.85.Ni, 21.65.+f Typeset usi...
متن کاملTypeset Using Revt E X 1
The isospin-invariant interacting boson model IBM-3 is analyzed in situations where SUT (3) charge symmetry [or, equivalently, UL(6) sd symmetry] is conserved. Analytic expressions for energies, electromagnetic transitions, two-nucleon transfer probabilities, and boson-number expectation values are obtained for the three possible dynamical symmetry limits, U(5), SU(3), and O(6). Results found i...
متن کامل